<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Videogum &#187; Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://videogum.com/tag/hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://videogum.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OUR Generation&#8217;s Rebecca, 4 Real</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/470341/our-generations-rebecca-4-real/remakes-and-spinoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/470341/our-generations-rebecca-4-real/remakes-and-spinoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remakes And Spinoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred Hitchcock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reboots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=470341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that all this time you were thinking that Rebecca Black was our generation&#8217;s Rebecca, and that they could stop trying to give our generation a Rebecca because we already have one and she&#8217;s perfect thankyouverymuch, but NOPE! You were wrong. Check it out the evidence of how wrong you were, from Variety: DreamWorks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that all this time you were thinking that Rebecca Black was our generation&#8217;s Rebecca, and that they could stop trying to give our generation a Rebecca because we already have one and she&#8217;s perfect thankyouverymuch, but NOPE! You were wrong. Check it out the evidence of how wrong you were, from <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118050011">Variety</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>DreamWorks and Working Title Films are embarking on a feature remake of Alfred Hitchcock&#8217;s classic mystery &#8221;Rebecca,&#8221; that will be written by &#8221;Eastern Promises&#8221; scribe Steven Knight, who will go back to the original book by Daphne DuMaurier.</p>
<p>Story follows a naive young woman who marries a rich widower and settles in his gigantic mansion, only to find that the memory of the first wife maintains a grip on her husband and the servants.</p></blockquote>
<p>PERFECT! A remake of Hitchcock&#8217;s classic film, <em>Rebecca</em>. Super good idea. If we&#8217;re going to make it through the project of rebooting every single movie ever made, it just MAKES SENSE to get the only Hitchcock film to ever win an Academy Award for Best Picture out of the way early on. Definitely needs some work, definitely needs maybe Kristen Stewart and Channing Tatum to star in it this time. Fantastic jobs all around, let&#8217;s all drink all the champagne we have under our big Hollywood money desks (24 emergency bottles) and then hire someone expensive to have sex with! #rebeccablack4rebecca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here Are Some Afternoon Links!</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/468712/here-are-some-afternoon-links-166/list/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/468712/here-are-some-afternoon-links-166/list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downton Abbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macaulay Culkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wet Hot American Summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=468712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like these pictures of a redditor&#8217;s dad, apparently, who photoshops himself into movies and movie posters SO MUCH! My goodness. What a hands-down delight. -Reddit This is a supercut of slow motion shots from Wes Anderson movies set to different Ja Rule songs. I bet you&#8217;re like, &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t IIIII think of that,&#8221; right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>I like these pictures of a redditor&#8217;s dad, apparently, who photoshops himself into movies and movie posters SO MUCH! My goodness. What a hands-down delight. -<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/ph0iw/so_my_dad_likes_to_photoshop_himself_into_movies/">Reddit</a></li>
<li>This is a supercut of slow motion shots from Wes Anderson movies set to different Ja Rule songs. I bet you&#8217;re like, &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t IIIII think of that,&#8221; right now, right? Ugh, you&#8217;re so predictable. -<a href="http://www.uproxx.com/webculture/2012/02/ja-rule-makes-every-wes-anderson-slow-motion-shot-better/">Uproxx</a></li>
<li>Will Ferrell introduced the starting line-ups of the Chicago Bulls and New Orleans Hornets at a basketball game yesterday. You should watch it, probably! It only takes like a minute and I think you&#8217;ll probably enjoy it! -<a href="http://www.sportsgrid.com/nba/will-farrell-bulls-hornets-introduction-video/  ">SportsGrid</a></li>
<li>So, Michael Showalter was on <em>What What Happens Live</em> last night and announced that there was &#8220;definitely&#8221; going to be a <em>Wet Hot American Summer </em>sequel. I think that was not a true statement? I mean, who knows. But I don&#8217;t think so? Right? Do you guys think so? -<a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2012/02/wet-hot-american-summer-is-definitely-getting-a-sequel">FilmDrunk</a></li>
<li>I&#8217;m certainly aware that everyone in Hollywood has a fake name because that&#8217;s just what the public WANTS, but I was still totally blown away by this slideshow of actor&#8217;s with their real names. Probably because my brain is feeling extra dumb today? I don&#8217;t know. But maybe you&#8217;ll like it too? And you&#8217;ll send the names to your friends? And you&#8217;ll be like, &#8220;Can you believe it?!&#8221; And they&#8217;ll be like, &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about this&#8221;? -<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/07/celebrities-real-names-stars-birth-names-lana-del-rey_n_1260664.html">HuffingtonPost</a></li>
<li>Oh my goodness, is Macaulay Culkin ok?! I really don&#8217;t think he is! Doesn&#8217;t he have anyone who loves him around? Does he need one of us to bring him some soup or milk or something? -<a href="http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/66429951.html">ONTD</a></li>
<li>Here is a video compilation of some Downton Abbey anachronisms. I would never in a million years know that a bunch of these were anachronisms. -<a href="http://ratsoff.com/post/17325640215/downton-abbey-anachronism-watch-questionable">RatsOff</a></li>
<li><em>Requiem for a Dream</em>,  your favorite movie of all time, recreated with puppets. Great. -<a href="http://thedailywh.at/2012/02/09/nightmare-on-sesame-street-of-the-day/">TheDailyWhat</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worlds Been Had Colliding: Selena Gomez And Eli Roth Edition</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/463911/worlds-been-had-colliding-selena-gomez-and-eli-roth-edition/celebrity-gossip/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/463911/worlds-been-had-colliding-selena-gomez-and-eli-roth-edition/celebrity-gossip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ice Cream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selena Gomez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=463911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a good photo of teenage Disney star and Justin Bieber lover/muse Selena Gomez eating some kind of parfait with Eli Roth, the creator of the Hostel torture-porn series. You might think it&#8217;s a weird combination, but that&#8217;s because you&#8217;re a NAIVE FOOL. Don&#8217;t you know that everybody famous knows and eats parfaits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a good photo of teenage Disney star and Justin Bieber lover/muse Selena Gomez eating some kind of parfait with Eli Roth, the creator of the <em>Hostel</em> torture-porn series. You might think it&#8217;s a weird combination, but that&#8217;s because you&#8217;re a NAIVE FOOL. Don&#8217;t you know that everybody famous knows and eats parfaits with everybody else famous? Come on, man. What magazines do you read? Just to give you a sense of how inter-connected and tight-knit the celebrity community is, here is who was eating desserts at the other tables at this dessert restaurant:</p>
<ul>
<li>Emma Stone and Christiane Amanpour</li>
<li>George A. Romero and Uggie from <em>The Artist</em></li>
<li>Judge Lance Ito and Jo Jo</li>
<li>Sporty Spice and John Hawkes</li>
<li>Jemaine Clement and Paul Pierce</li>
<li>Tavi Gevinson and Lil B the Based God</li>
<li>The entire cast of <em>Bones</em> and the entire cast of <em>Downton Abbey</em></li>
<li>Beyonce and Marc Maron</li>
</ul>
<p>See what I mean? It would almost be weirder if either Selena Gomez or Eli Roth were eating parfaits with someone that seemed more contextually, thematically, and age appropriate. THAT&#8217;S SHOWBUZZ! (Image via <a href="http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/66222370.html">ONTD</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Videogum Why Don&#8217;t YOU Caption It? Contest: The Annual Vanity Fair &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; Cover</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/463121/the-videogum-why-dont-you-caption-it-contest-the-annual-vanity-fair-hollywood-cover/franchises/why-dont-you-caption-it/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/463121/the-videogum-why-dont-you-caption-it-contest-the-annual-vanity-fair-hollywood-cover/franchises/why-dont-you-caption-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why Don't You Caption It?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adepero Oduye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brit Marling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felicity Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Chastain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Patton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooney Mara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shailene Woodley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=463121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s here! The annual &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; issue of Vanity Fair! Each year, Vanity Fair publishes 4 issues with Johnny Depp on the cover, 6 issues with John F. Kennedy Jr. on the cover, one Royal Family issue, and of course the Hollywood issue. (What a great magazine! I think my favorite thing about it are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.videogum.com/files/2012/01/vanity_fair_hollywood_lg.jpg"><img src="http://cdn.videogum.com/files/2012/01/vanity_fair_hollywood_sm.jpg" alt="" title="vanity_fair_hollywood_sm" width="608" height="296" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-463131" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s here! The annual &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; issue of <em>Vanity Fair</em>! Each year, <em>Vanity Fair</em> publishes 4 issues with Johnny Depp on the cover, 6 issues with John F. Kennedy Jr. on the cover, one Royal Family issue, and of course the Hollywood issue. (What a great magazine! I think my favorite thing about it are the cover articles about Cher.) This year&#8217;s Hollywood cover features the following actresses: Jennifer Lawrence, Mia Wasikowska, Jessica Chastain, Rooney Mara, Elizabeth Olsen, Lily Collins, Shailene Woodley, Paula Patton, Felicity Jones, Brit Marling, Adepero Oduye. I will give you <a href="http://jezebel.com/5880848/vanity-fairs-hollywood-issue-pushes-actresses-of-color-aside-again">one guess on whether the actresses of color appear on the outside of the magazine or folded up on the inside of the magazine</a>. (Hint: &#8220;the 1997 hit film, <em>Amistad</em>.&#8221;) (<em>Vanity Fair</em> could try to argue that the cover alignment simply represents a star&#8217;s actual box office draw, except that I&#8217;m pretty sure more people saw Paula Patton&#8217;s <em>Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol</em> than all of the movies featuring the front cover actresses combined. Ding dong! I rest my case!) This is always a very fun caption contest because there are so many choices! Will you make a <em>The Hunger Games</em> joke about Jennifer Lawrence? Will you make a Rooney Mara joke about what is up with Rooney Mara? Will you make a who is Mia Wasikowska joke? It&#8217;s up to you. YOU are the Hollywood big-shot now! (No, you aren&#8217;t.)</p>
<p>Winner will receive special placement in this week&#8217;s Monsters&#8217; Ball, also known as &#8220;A Civilian Oscar.&#8221; (Click the image to enlarge.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Friendly Chat With Gabe And Kelly: Bristol Palin Is Leaving Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/447181/a-friendly-chat-with-gabe-and-kelly-bristol-palin-is-leaving-hollywood/friendly-chat/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/447181/a-friendly-chat-with-gabe-and-kelly-bristol-palin-is-leaving-hollywood/friendly-chat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friendly Chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing With The Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=447181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gabe: hey Kelly: Hey, Gabe Gabe: what&#8217;s up? Kelly: Well, I have some bad news. Gabe: ok hold on Gabe disconnected. Gabe reconnected. Gabe: Keep holding. Kelly: I am holding. Gabe: i&#8217;m waiting for time to pass Gabe: and for the tide to change Gabe: i&#8217;m just not sure i can deal with any bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> hey<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> Hey, Gabe<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> what&#8217;s up?<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> Well, I have some bad news.<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> ok hold on<br />
<em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe disconnected.</span> </em><br />
<em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe reconnected.</span> </em><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> Keep holding.<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> I am holding.<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> i&#8217;m waiting for time to pass<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> and for the tide to change<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> i&#8217;m just not sure i can deal with any bad news right now<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> One thing you have to understand though<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> are you holding?<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> Yeah I&#8217;m holding.<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> just keep holding<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> Is that you can&#8217;t outrun bad news<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> fine, what is it?<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> You know how you were really excited about the career of up-and-coming Hollywood starlet Bristol Palin?<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> so wait<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> you have bad news<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> but first i have to play a guessing game?<br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> i have to WIN my bad news?<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> It&#8217;s not a guessing game it&#8217;s a yes or no<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> And moreover a rhetorical yes or no<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> Because OF COURSE you remember<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly:</span> So, I&#8217;m sorry, because <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/10/bristol-palin-leaves-hollywood-returns-alaska_n_1197045.html?ref=entertainment">she is moving back to Alaska.</a><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;">Gabe:</span> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br />
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br />
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br />
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br />
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO<br />
<p><a href="http://videogum.com/447181/a-friendly-chat-with-gabe-and-kelly-bristol-palin-is-leaving-hollywood/friendly-chat/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My The Black List, 2011</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/431042/my-the-black-list-2011/movies/screenplays/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/431042/my-the-black-list-2011/movies/screenplays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screenplays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Black List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=431042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 2004, a Hollywood executive named Franklin Leonard has compiled a list of the &#8220;hottest&#8221; up-and-coming but unproduced screenplays in town as voted on by a secret elite squad of more than 300 fellow executives and fat cats. The list has helped to launch the careers of people like Diablo Cody, and whoever wrote (500) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2004, a Hollywood executive named Franklin Leonard has compiled a list of the &#8220;hottest&#8221; up-and-coming but unproduced screenplays in town as voted on by a secret elite squad of more than 300 fellow executives and fat cats. The list has helped to launch the careers of people like Diablo Cody, and whoever wrote <em>(500) Days of Summer</em>. Today, the list for 2011 came out, and you can read it <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/12/the-black-list-2011-screenplay-roster/">here</a>. Congratulations to everyone who made this year&#8217;s list. Especially a promising young man named Quentin Tarantino?! (Some people complain that the list has become a publicity tool of the studios, and that rather than highlighting unknown writers as it was originally intended to do, the list is now a collection of relatively high-profile and pre-vetted projects written by established showbiz insiders. I have no idea what half of the words in that sentence even mean, so I do not know if this is true or not, but I will say that Quentin Tarantino getting a script on The Black List definitely suggests that something might be up. Congratulations to him, though. Fingers crossed for all of his hopes and dreams.) Of course, as is Hollywood Tradition, another Black List was released today. Gabe Delahaye&#8217;s Black List Of Make Believe Movie Titles He Just Made Up Two Seconds Ago 2011. It&#8217;s a real treat every year. People love it. (Previously: <a href="http://videogum.com/255672/my-the-black-list-2010/top-stories/">My The Black List, 2010</a>, <a href="http://videogum.com/105671/my_the_black_list_2009/news/">My The Black List, 2009</a>, and <a href="http://videogum.com/40771/my_the_black_list/awards/">My The Black List, 2008</a>.)</p>
<p>As always, I am proud to present first and exclusively the My The Black List in its entirety:<br />
<p><a href="http://videogum.com/431042/my-the-black-list-2011/movies/screenplays/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duh Aficionado Magazine: There Is Gender Bias In Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/420031/duh-aficionado-magazine-there-is-gender-bias-in-hollywood/movies/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/420031/duh-aficionado-magazine-there-is-gender-bias-in-hollywood/movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duh Aficionado Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=420031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duh Aficionado magazine got SCOOPED this morning, by an article in the LA Times headlined Gender inequality still has a starring role in Hollywood, USC study finds. Oh man, OF COURSE IT DOES! We should have been all over this one, and we apologize to our (male) readers for dropping the ball. Here are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh Aficionado magazine got SCOOPED this morning, by an article in the <em>LA Times</em> headlined <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-film-gender-20111122,0,915239.story">Gender inequality still has a starring role in Hollywood, USC study finds</a>. Oh man, OF COURSE IT DOES! We should have been all over this one, and we apologize to our (male) readers for dropping the ball. Here are the most important and most obvious findings:</p>
<blockquote><p>The USC study determined that women were still far more likely than men to wear sexy clothing in movies, such as swimwear and unbuttoned shirts (25.8% versus 4.7%), to expose skin (23% versus 7.4%) and to be described by another character as attractive (10.9% versus 2.5%).</p>
<p>Revealing clothing and partial nudity was just as prevalent among 13- to 20-year-old female characters as it was among those 21 to 29, suggesting that females are sexualized on-screen at young ages, Smith said.</p>
<p>Behind the camera, the gender inequality is just as dramatic: only 3.6% of the directors and 13.5% of the writers on the top-grossing films of 2009 were female, according to the study.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup. That sounds about right. Although I&#8217;m surprised this article/study didn&#8217;t at least point out the counter-argument, which is didn&#8217;t you ladies get <em>Bridesmaids</em> this year? How many movies do you NEED?! LOLOLOL. JK, ladies. You&#8217;re beautiful. Do you have a sister? In an effort to remind the Duh Industry that <em>Duh Aficionado</em> is still the premiere resource for breaking the obvious stories, we are going to issue our own scientific research in the following days covering other Hollywood trends that may or may not be based in actual reality*. Here is a short list:<br />
<p><a href="http://videogum.com/420031/duh-aficionado-magazine-there-is-gender-bias-in-hollywood/movies/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brad Pitt &#8220;Retiring From Acting In The Next Three Years&#8221; Movies!</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/413581/brad-pitt-retiring-from-acting-in-the-next-three-years-movies/celebrity-gossip/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/413581/brad-pitt-retiring-from-acting-in-the-next-three-years-movies/celebrity-gossip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not True Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=413581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get out all of your funeral gear because we&#8217;re gonna have to throw a big one! JUST DO IT!! 47-year-old actor Brad Pitt, you may know him as &#8220;Will Colbert&#8221; from the television series Friends, has been going around telling everyone that he&#8217;s going to retire from acting when he turns fifty. THAT&#8217;S IN JUST [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get out all of your funeral gear because we&#8217;re gonna have to throw a big one! JUST DO IT!! 47-year-old actor Brad Pitt, you may know him as &#8220;Will Colbert&#8221; from the television series <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0583642/">Friends</a></em>, has been going around telling everyone that he&#8217;s going to retire from acting when he turns fifty. THAT&#8217;S IN JUST THREE YEARS! R.I.P. movies! From <a href="http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/brad-pitt-pledges-to-retire-from-acting-by-the-age/252453">NME</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Hollywood big hitter has suggested that he will likely stop appearing on screen in within the &#8220;next three years,&#8221; but hinted that he would continue to work behind the camera. He told Australian talkshow 60 Minutes: &#8220;I&#8217;ve really enjoyed the producerial side and getting stories to the plate that may have had a harder time otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p>The interview echoes previous comments about his screen career having a shelf life in the Sunday Times: &#8220;We all have a shelf life, and mine is coming. Although there are a couple of things I&#8217;d still like to do. I am looking forward to playing a grumpy old dude one day, that&#8217;s for sure.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously this is very serious. I don&#8217;t think there is any way that Brad Pitt could renege on this formal resignation that in no way hints or even states outright that he will continue acting into old age. What will Hollywood do without him?! WHO WILL PLAY ALL THE BENJAMIN BUTTONS!? I do think, though, that in a time like this Brad Pitt would rather have us celebrate the life of his career than mourn its definitely for real death. So let&#8217;s do that! With a Brad Pitt retirement movies game! YAY!!!<p><a href="http://videogum.com/413581/brad-pitt-retiring-from-acting-in-the-next-three-years-movies/celebrity-gossip/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paramount Pictures Building A $700 Million &#8220;Boom Boom Room&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/377651/paramount-pictures-building-a-700-million-boom-boom-room/behind-the-scenes/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/377651/paramount-pictures-building-a-700-million-boom-boom-room/behind-the-scenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behind The Scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paramount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showbiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=377651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exciting multi-million dollar construction project news! Paramount is undergoing a 700 million dollar, 25-year-long renovation of its landmark studios. From Hollywood Reporter: Paramount Pictures is planning a $700 million upgrade of its Hollywood headquarters, which cover 62 acres, the company said Tuesday. The studio, which has been based in its current location since 1926, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting multi-million dollar construction project news! Paramount is undergoing a 700 million dollar, 25-year-long renovation of its landmark studios. From <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/paramount-embarking-700-million-makeover-237991">Hollywood Reporter</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Paramount Pictures is planning a $700 million upgrade of its Hollywood headquarters, which cover 62 acres, the company said Tuesday. The studio, which has been based in its current location since 1926, is filing applications with the city of Los Angeles for what it is dubbing the Hollywood Project, a 25-year plan to improve its existing studio lot and adjacent properties.</p>
<p>Most of the development will take place at the studio’s main 56-acre lot at 5555 Melrose Ave., which was created when Paramount bought the former RKO Studios from Desilu Productions in 1967. Portions of the lot along Melrose and limited areas within the main production area are being targeted for development, although the studio said it will maintain many of the historic structures while modernizing them. The plan also involves six properties in Hollywood adjacent to the studio.</p></blockquote>
<p>So dope. I&#8217;m a HUGE multi-million dollar, decades spanning, ambitious and forward-thinking brand revitalizing construction projects head. LOVE &#8216;EM! Cannot get enough of &#8216;em. This one looks pretty promising. Check out some of the planned upgrades:<br />
<p><a href="http://videogum.com/377651/paramount-pictures-building-a-700-million-boom-boom-room/behind-the-scenes/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpongeBob SquarePants Is OUR Generation&#8217;s Gumby</title>
		<link>http://videogum.com/373762/spongebob-squarepants-is-our-generations-gumby/justice/</link>
		<comments>http://videogum.com/373762/spongebob-squarepants-is-our-generations-gumby/justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpongeBob SquarePants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videogum.com/?p=373762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh wait. A joke about SpongeBob SquarePants being OUR generation&#8217;s Gumby is not actually that funny. You know, because of how HE IS LITERALLY OUR GENERATION&#8217;S GUMBY. You know what else isn&#8217;t funny? Dudes dressing up as children&#8217;s cartoon characters and harassing women on the street. From the LA Times: A man dressed as SpongeBob [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait. A joke about SpongeBob SquarePants being OUR generation&#8217;s <a href="http://videogum.com/tag/gumby/">Gumby</a> is not actually that funny. You know, because of how HE IS <em>LITERALLY</em> OUR GENERATION&#8217;S GUMBY. You know what else isn&#8217;t funny? Dudes dressing up as children&#8217;s cartoon characters and harassing women on the street. From the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/09/lapd-arrests-man-in-spongebob-squarepants-outfit.html"><em>LA Times</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A man dressed as SpongeBob SquarePants was detained by police outside Grauman&#8217;s Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, officials said Wednesday.</p>
<p>The man was questioned but not arrested Tuesday in what a Los Angeles Police Department official described as a &#8220;brief incident with two females.&#8221; No other details were available.</p></blockquote>
<p>You know what, Hollywood? How about no more adult-sized costumes of cartoon characters? They are clearly only for criminals. This is actually a perfect plan (to combat the perfect crimes) because let&#8217;s be honest, there is absolutely no reason for an adult to NEED a costume of a cartoon character, ever, not even on Halloween&#8211;Grow up, boys!&#8211;so this way if you make the costumes illegal contraband then as soon as you hear an adult ask &#8220;Hey, where are your Huckleberry Hound costumes?&#8221; you just arrest them on the spot before the crime is even committed! What do you think, precogs?<br />
<p><a href="http://videogum.com/373762/spongebob-squarepants-is-our-generations-gumby/justice/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
