Profile 
talkingstove

Latest Comments

 +8Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

I feel like calling a dude out who is just pulling out his opinions in an non offensive way is a dick move. I don’t like gifs or Twitter. I have legitimate reasons, I am not shit stirring. Unfortunately, those are the topics of the day, so I’m going to come across as a jerkface.

 -2Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

I’m sorry that my vague joshing criticism of Twitter hurt you so. I will tailor my comments for your pleasure in the future.

 -3Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

Just so it’s clear, I don’t give a shit about Monster’s Ball/upvotes. Whatever. But the advent of Monster’s Ball brought on tons of .gifs. And it is my personal opinion .gifs rarely add anything. They aren’t interesting. They are often used in place where word would do just as well, replays part of shows we have already seen, or shoehorned in cause the person found them and thought they were funny. The vast majority of .gifs here are just reposting .gifs people found somewhere else. If I wanted that, I’d go here: http://gifparty.tumblr.com/ 

Use your words, people. You are smart. Be original. To quote Gabe, you can better.

 -18Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

Sorry if you disagree, but the .gifs aren’t relevant. The top comment sums up to “Eh, whatever, .gif targeted to an inside joke!”. I like werttrew’s, but honestly the writing is what I like. And the Zoolostander is again nothing of substance. Feel free to disagree, but I fail to see how they are relevant to the post.

But for real, I dislike Monster’s Ball. It encourages pandering and discourages alternative thoughts. I think the real disease is MB, .gifs are just a symptom. But honestly, I’ll probably just forget about the comments and just read the posts in the future.

 -7Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

Though I guess I answered my own question with the whole LCD/popular thing.

 -25Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

 -7Posted on Mar 19th, 2010 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (388 comments)

What’s a twitter? I thought people just put out their only funny to themselves thoughts under well written blog posts in hopes of upvotes and balling a monster. Is it just a site where everything is just comments?

Man, that is a dumb idea. It will never succeed.

 +17Posted on Mar 17th, 2010 | re: Four Lions Puts The LOLs Back In Terrolololorism (141 comments)

I’m such an old school Videogum grump. I disliked Da Cake Eatur for being an annoyance and still dislike Am Pat for his old faux-conservative troll shtick. But I almost perfer them to the .gif party that rules today. My .gif rule: if it is pertinent, it’s good. And it must be extremely pertinent. If it is random or shoehorned at all, you can go to hell.

I feel all Gran Torino here.

 +19Posted on Mar 17th, 2010 | re: Did Ashton Kutcher's New Movie Steal From Agent Cody Banks? (68 comments)

Hell, Preston was even rocking a Mac back in ’94. Williamsburg owes a lot to this guy.

 +53Posted on Mar 17th, 2010 | re: Did Ashton Kutcher's New Movie Steal From Agent Cody Banks? (68 comments)

Respect, motherfuckers.