Profile 
limesix
Find Me On: twitter

Latest Comments

Comments

 +19Posted on Aug 5th, 2013 | re: Let's Take A Moment Here (67 comments)

Clear eyes, full hearts, Kelly 4 Ever. (nothing is 4 ever, but you know what I mean)

It’s times like this that I am so sad that “You Can Make It Up” seems to be retired.

 +5Posted on Nov 26th, 2012 | re: Everyone Saw A Movie This Past Weekend, Did You? (54 comments)

Saw Skyfall, which, after the kind of overlong/wobbly/stupidly titled Quantum of Solace, was surprisingly great! I mean, obviously the Daniel Craig movies are kind of retreads of the Bourne movies (which are retreads of other things), but after years of Pierce Brosnan killing that series, it’s nice to be able to enjoy Bond movies again.

 0Posted on Apr 16th, 2012 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (58 comments)

YES to the Lake House and also Wild Hogs. The best.

 +4Posted on Apr 14th, 2012 | re: Monsters' Ball: The Week's Best Comments (58 comments)

It’s a catch-22 as far as comments are concerned, for me, because in general my favorite posts are the ones that require no comment and/or don’t invite a ton of back and forth. Also I don’t comment very often. But the stuff I read and love, in roughly descending order:

- Heartfelt social commentary (Nike video, Ain’t No Such Thing as a Free Louis CK show, etc.)
- Political commentary (Sarah Palin did not Cause the Arizona Shootings but is still an Asshole, etc.)
- Duh Aficionado Magazine entries of all stripes (duh)
- WMOAT
- Recaps (True Blood and Top Chef were my favorites, though I hesitate to encourage you to watch more bad TV)

I realize, reading this list, that everything here probably requires the most possible effort, but I love the writing on video gum, and that’s why I come back – not so much for the trampoline accidents (although everything has its place).

 +7Posted on Jan 5th, 2012 | re: Top Chef S09E08: This Is The Barbecue Pits (43 comments)

I have never watched and will never watch these shows, and I rarely comment, but I will log in specifically to say these are my favorite ongoing feature (as long as TWMOAT is on hiatus but still a close second even when it isn’t). And closely followed by YCMIU.

It’s just there isn’t usually a ton to say about them – I read and laugh and move on.

 +3Posted on Jul 21st, 2011 | re: The Hunt For The Worst Movie Of All Time: Boondock Saints (207 comments)

Just think about how sad Boondock Saints would be if it didn’t have so many loyal lovers of cinema to defend it, in such colorful language, no less.

Heartbreaking.

Co-sign. Never have understood the thing with people going crazy for this place.

 +2Posted on Jun 20th, 2011 | re: Heaven Just Got A Little More Ryan Dunn (52 comments)

Sorry – I actually didn’t mean this thread in particular (I had barely even read it) – just read through the other and it was very… contentious when compared to most of the commentary now.

That’s all.

 +4Posted on Jun 20th, 2011 | re: Heaven Just Got A Little More Ryan Dunn (52 comments)

Reading the comments on that linked Natasha Richardson post, I was amazed by how many more dick commenters there used to be. Thanks for being decent, monster community. It’s nice.

 +28Posted on Jun 20th, 2011 | re: Heaven Just Got A Little More Ryan Dunn (52 comments)

Obvious comment, but man – it’s got to be the utter height of egotism to make other people’s deaths about YOU.

 +2Posted on Jun 3rd, 2011 | re: Operation Watch This: Out Of Sight (40 comments)

Not that I need other people to validate my opinions, but I guess I need other people to validate my opinions, because it’s nice to know that other people like Out of Sight. However, I’m pretty sure that the Jennifer Lopez in the movie is a replicant that Jlo Mk II destroyed as a threat to her “musical” empire.

 +25Posted on Jun 2nd, 2011 | re: The Videogum 6-Month Performance Review (468 comments)

I have actually considered/assumed that, but honestly I’d take fewer random posts during the day in exchange for more recaps. Not an UNREASONABLE amount – just more.

 +3Posted on Jun 2nd, 2011 | re: The Videogum 6-Month Performance Review (468 comments)

Some thoughts:

- I think facebook is always going to be tough sledding because of the nature of the site. It’s built around the idea of a commenting community that exists on the site, so I’m never that surprised when the active members aren’t spending a lot of time commenting on Facebook. That being said, I share stuff whenever it’s awesome (often) and would think other devoted readers should (and probably do) the same.

- I’d love to see more recaps, which I think play to Gabe’s strengths (and to be honest I think social commentary is the other thing he’s particularly strong at), but I also realize there are only so many seasons of True Blood or whatever you can watch before your soul corrodes. I might suggest a more active rotation of shows (both good and awful) to recap. I love Top Chef recaps, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t pull the masses in. Recap Outsourced! Recap the new version of Two and a Half Men with Charlie Sheen’s replacement. Recap Sherlock! Or whatever. Maybe do them in four episode bursts where you can bail out when/if you want to. But more recaps, for sure. I visit the site throughout the day, but save recaps for when I can really savor them.

And I’ll try to think of more. But honestly I mostly don’t have any complaints.

 +2Posted on May 31st, 2011 | re: The Videogum Movie Club: The Hangover Part II (69 comments)

In related “things I knew were going to be terrible” news, this is pretty much exactly why I hated American Pie 2, only with less dismemberments and penises (I assume).

 +1Posted on Apr 28th, 2011 | re: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part II Trailer, You Guys (97 comments)

Agreed – like I said, I was being unfair in my backlash. I read the first part of the first book and it had a very James and the Giant Peach kind of feel. Obviously there’s a lot more to it than that.

 +5Posted on Apr 28th, 2011 | re: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part II Trailer, You Guys (97 comments)

haha – fair enough. But I’m really not trolling or disliking just to be Winwood or whatever. Bob’s Burgers is great! Arrested Development is the best show ever! The Office is pretty funny sometimes although it used to be much better! Christopher Guest makes really funny movies! Etc.!

I have nothing against populist opinions – just wasn’t able to get on board with this one.

 +3Posted on Apr 28th, 2011 | re: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part II Trailer, You Guys (97 comments)

Ha. Sue Sylvester would approve.

 +1Posted on Apr 28th, 2011 | re: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part II Trailer, You Guys (97 comments)

I looked through the linked comments too, and it’s sort of blowing my mind a little how many people love this. I always felt a little (completely undeserved, admittedly) backlash towards the books, because, you know, people have been writing good kid’s books for decades, so what makes JK Rowling so special just because she figured out how to rip off Roald Dahl and not get sued?

But of course they’re kids books and who cares and I got over it. And since I wasn’t invested in the books, I watched the first few movies sort of eagerly because a) I didn’t know what happened in them, and b) fun fantasy series of movies! Why not?

And I came out of them feeling much as Gabe does in this post – like, what? They’re dull and lifeless and poorly plotted and nearly free of any real sense of adventure and they have WAY too many child actors who aren’t particularly good at their jobs and… whatever. My biggest complaint as a complete non-fan is the extent to which Harry is a total cipher that I find it nearly impossible to care about. Through the first three movies at least, he doesn’t DO anything – stuff happens to him and he almost gets killed and someone saves him. Whatever.

So bring on the downvotes, I guess.

 +4Posted on Apr 19th, 2011 | re: Thursday Night TV Open Thread (126 comments)

I’m not going to downvote this because whatever, but I would say that it’s a bit shortsighted to assume that because you watched one episode of the third season of a show involving an semi-emotional plot that only has any resonance if you’ve seen most of the preceding episodes and didn’t like it, that you dislike the show as a whole.

I like every other comedy show you say you like below, not that that’s a total indicator of taste, and of course it doesn’t really matter to me if you like Parks and Rec or not, but if we were friends, it would be the first (comedic) show I would recommend you watch that is currently on the air. The second would be Bob’s Burgers.

 +20Posted on Mar 24th, 2011 | re: An Open Letter To Good Morning America Concerning The Chris Brown Situation (180 comments)

Is it just me (and I know there are exceptions – sorry, exceptions! I love you!) or would these conversations be a lot less douchey if Vgum didn’t have facebook connect for commenting?

 +4Posted on Mar 15th, 2011 | re: What is the HTML for "Vomit"?: A Review of Battle: Los Angeles (101 comments)

Also, that is basically what she said.

 +2Posted on Mar 15th, 2011 | re: What is the HTML for "Vomit"?: A Review of Battle: Los Angeles (101 comments)

Sure – like I said to The N above (basically), that’s a valid point of view. But the way you wrote your critique of it is above is insulting and dismissive. I like it and you don’t, but there’s nothing wrong with trying hard.

 +7Posted on Mar 15th, 2011 | re: What is the HTML for "Vomit"?: A Review of Battle: Los Angeles (101 comments)

I will give you that yesterday wasn’t that “funny,” but I found his writing very entertaining. You didn’t enjoy it, fine, the reason people are downvoting you isn’t because you’ve taken a political stance, it’s because you’re kind of being a dick about it.

Don’t know Mans personally, but I’d feel a bit insulted to have my work dismissed out of hand in an insulting manner. That’s all.

 +14Posted on Mar 15th, 2011 | re: What is the HTML for "Vomit"?: A Review of Battle: Los Angeles (101 comments)

There sure are a lot of jerks on the site today.