THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT. For those of you still holding out hope both that Ghostbusters 3 will eventually be made and that Bill Murray will reprise his role as Peter Venkman, this is a good news/bad news/bad news situation. DROP WHAT YOU’RE DOING AND LISTEN. The good news is that Dan Aykroyd is still saying that Ghostbusters 3 is going to happen and the bad news is that you’re going to need to get a life and the other bad news is, when asked if Bill Murray would be a part of the cast, Aykroyd responded: “No, I can tell you he won’t be involved.” THIS IS NOT A TEST! REEEER REEEEER REEEER. From Metro:

It’s sad but we’re passing it on to a new generation. Ghostbusters 3 can be a successful movie without Bill. My preference would be to have him involved but at this point he doesn’t seem to be coming and we have to move on. It’s time to make the third one.

I REPEAT: THIS IS NOT A TEST. All of those other times Bill Murray said he wasn’t going to be in Ghostbusters 3, over and over again, including the time when he shred the script, were NOT FALSE RUMORS! THAT IS OF COURSE UNLESS THIS ONE IS A FALSE RUMOR! We will all just have to wait to see Bill Murray’s response to Dan Aykroyd’s confirmation that Bill Murray’s announcement that he is not going to take part in Ghostbusters 3 is true. The world is waiting, Bill Murray! ARE YOU IN OR ARE YOU OUT?!

Comments (26)
  1. Obviously, the world has absolutely no need for a Ghostbusters 3. But since Bill Murray was absolutely the best part of the first two (and also most other things involving Bill Murray), this is, indeed, dire news.

  2. Bill Murray can say that he’s not going to do this as many times as he wants, but no one will ever believe him.

  3. I have it on good authority that if they try and make another Ghostbusters without him, the consequences will be of biblical proportions. Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes…the dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!

  4. Instead of Bill Murray maybe….Zack Galifianakis?

  5. YES, IT’S true your honor.

    This movie HAS NO Bill Murray.

  6. Get Owen Wilson and Jason Schwartzman in it, maybe let Wes Anderson direct, and I’ll bet he comes on.

  7. That makes me a sad panda.

  8. Guys, they don’t need Bill Murray at ALL for Ghostbusters 3. Don’t you remember how much better Meatballs II and Caddyshack II were without him?

  9. maybe not GB3, but how about generally, how about generally how much Bill Murray I need in MY LIFE

  10. Also i would just like to add Ghostbusters 2 is not as bad as everyone says, sure it isnt great but it wasnt horrible nor bad it was ok! Just saying!
    check out the post right here==============================>

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.