Posted on Dec 15th, 2010 by Gabe Delahaye
29 Comments
Tweet
It is never anything other than hilarious when Playboy does some sexy cross-promotion that is as unnecessary as it is inappropriate. Tron is a movie for children, right? See also: Playboy celebrates the 25th anniversary of Back to the Future.
You Might Also Like
![]() NSFW: Playboy Magazine Celebrates The 25th Anniversary Of… | ![]() Scott Disick + American Psycho = Kanye West? | ![]() Petman Tests Camo | ![]() Duh Aficionado Magazine: Courtney Stodden Appears Topless… |
Leave a Reply
Sign inSign in with FacebookYou must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.
































See also: Marge Simpson pictorial. Actually, don’t see it, just remember that it exists. Don’t look at it, please.
She’s pretty
I’m all for nudity but somebody should probably towel off that lightcycle seat.
IS Tron a movie for children? The first one was, maybe, but is this sequel appealing to anybody who wasn’t alive for the original?
I haven’t seen the original and want to see this one, also it’s pg
The first one was pretty great. You know, for an 80s action film. Most impressive for its computer animation stuff. It’s crazy impressive when you take into account it was 1982.
And of course, they got beaten for the title by the XXX parody :
http://io9.com/5689116/inevitable-tron-xxx-parody-titled-pron-has-glow-job-scene
He he, Pron.
C’mon everybody #pornmovies.
Calling Baby Friday!
King: The Story of LePron James
Transporners
Insertion
Winter’s Bone
The Pournist
Pochanass
Up In Her Butt
Hapenis
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Poon
A Sexual Man.
Inside Her House Rules
Men Who Stare At Goatse.
Sorry, just want to make sure I’m on board here, I’m not supposed to like this right?
…well shit, that might be difficult, guys.
Guess this answers my question
I have to ask, is that really supposed to be attractive? Is there a set of people that love themed quasi-porn?
yes and yes and don’t judge me
I think we WILL judge you…. judge you AWESOME! Ill see myself out….
You are obviously unfamiliar with Internet Rules 34 and 36.
This make sense, considering Playboy is basically CGI anyway.
The Nude abides.
And now The Discovery Channel is getting in on the porn action :
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-schedules/special.html?paid=1.403.25872.0.0
I don’t… doesn’t Playboy usually feature WOMEN in its pictorials? I mean, who wants to see THIS GUY naked?
This may have been too obscure. I apologize!
If a man did create a virtual world like TRON, it would look more like this, but I don’t think Disney thought a movie about the angst and addiction of a computer nerd virtually satisfied, but emotionally left empty would appeal to a wide audience.
This movie only appeals to ten guys on the internet anyway.And they have probably left humanity far behind in their porn intake.